Re: c.d.theory glossary
From: mAsterdam <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 14:54:28 +0200
Message-ID: <40812909$0$558$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 14:54:28 +0200
Message-ID: <40812909$0$558$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
Alfredo Novoa wrote:
>>`Formal Theory' should be included.
>> ... Object (n): `Something intelligible or perceptible by the mind.'
> I don't see any formality here. I would exclude Object from the list.
With 'list' are you referring to Timothy's 'Formal Theory' list or to the glossary? If the latter, why would an entry in the glossary require formality? Received on Sat Apr 17 2004 - 14:54:28 CEST