Re: Date's First Great Blunder
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 10:36:19 -0500
Message-ID: <c5oui3$hs8$1_at_news.netins.net>
"Eric Kaun" <ekaun_at_yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:VEyfc.640$_o7.513_at_newssvr15.news.prodigy.com...
> "Dawn M. Wolthuis" <dwolt_at_tincat-group.com> wrote in message
> news:c5kave$i4r$1_at_news.netins.net...
> > "Eric Kaun" <ekaun_at_yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:4Lhfc.281$%r4.200_at_newssvr16.news.prodigy.com...
<snip>
> Interfaces are more specification than reuse. Abstract base classes are
for
> reuse, but it's very, very easy to get things horribly wrong.
<snip>
I know this is a minor point, but have to reply. It is not the interfaces
themselves that are reusable code, but the use of interfaces for writing
services and for being able to reuse code with classes that implement an
interface of subclass thereof that makes me a fan of interfaces. --dawn
Received on Fri Apr 16 2004 - 17:36:19 CEST