Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: Date's First Great Blunder

Re: Date's First Great Blunder

From: Dawn M. Wolthuis <dwolt_at_tincat-group.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 10:36:19 -0500
Message-ID: <c5oui3$hs8$1@news.netins.net>


"Eric Kaun" <ekaun_at_yahoo.com> wrote in message news:VEyfc.640$_o7.513_at_newssvr15.news.prodigy.com...
> "Dawn M. Wolthuis" <dwolt_at_tincat-group.com> wrote in message
> news:c5kave$i4r$1_at_news.netins.net...
> > "Eric Kaun" <ekaun_at_yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:4Lhfc.281$%r4.200_at_newssvr16.news.prodigy.com...
<snip>
> Interfaces are more specification than reuse. Abstract base classes are
for
> reuse, but it's very, very easy to get things horribly wrong.
<snip>
I know this is a minor point, but have to reply. It is not the interfaces themselves that are reusable code, but the use of interfaces for writing services and for being able to reuse code with classes that implement an interface of subclass thereof that makes me a fan of interfaces. --dawn Received on Fri Apr 16 2004 - 10:36:19 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US