Re: c.d.theory glossary
From: mAsterdam <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 23:09:14 +0200
Message-ID: <407ef9fd$0$558$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
> I figured you could check off the ones you thought most important. There
> might be some not on that list, but it is likely close to a superset of what
> you are looking for, right? Which of those do you think would help us agree
> on some common language in order to move forward from that point? --dawn
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 23:09:14 +0200
Message-ID: <407ef9fd$0$558$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
> "mAsterdam" wrote:
>>I guess what I am asking is a kind of self-censorship: please >>mention just a few words which, if discussed in the glossary >>you think will help building common ground.Dawn M. Wolthuis wrote:
> I figured you could check off the ones you thought most important. There
> might be some not on that list, but it is likely close to a superset of what
> you are looking for, right? Which of those do you think would help us agree
> on some common language in order to move forward from that point? --dawn
This service is now discontinued. Received on Thu Apr 15 2004 - 23:09:14 CEST