Re: A Bill of Materials Question
From: Timothy J. Bruce <uniblab_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 15 Apr 2004 11:52:56 -0700
Message-ID: <34519632.0404151052.198b1a68_at_posting.google.com>
Date: 15 Apr 2004 11:52:56 -0700
Message-ID: <34519632.0404151052.198b1a68_at_posting.google.com>
Laconic2:
Since the string `Bill of Materials' is NOT _the_ Bill of Materials document, I guess we wouldn't break any laws if it were included, nor would we be derelict if we omitted it.
Congrats, sir, we both win.
This all rather silly, of course, which is why I like it,
Timothy J. Bruce
uniblab_at_hotmail.com
</RANT>
Received on Thu Apr 15 2004 - 20:52:56 CEST