Re: newby (very) question on XML DB theory

From: Jan Hidders <jan.hidders_at_REMOVETHIS.pandora.be>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 20:18:42 GMT
Message-ID: <CWXec.70566$IX6.4421683_at_phobos.telenet-ops.be>

Dawn M. Wolthuis wrote:
>
> I'm still thinking that is not your best bang for the buck. I'm hoping the
> XML databases get to the point where their query language is as easy as PICK
> and have hope for them yet (in spite of those tags they drag along with
> every value, ugh!)

You think XQuery is too difficult? By the way, what makes you think that in XQuery / XML databases you have to drag tags along with values?

Jan Hidders

Received on Tue Apr 13 2004 - 22:18:42 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jan Hidders: "Re: How is this collection called?"
Previous message: Jan Hidders: "Re: Normalization by Composing, not just Decomposing"
In reply to: Dawn M. Wolthuis: "Re: newby (very) question on XML DB theory"
In reply to Dawn M. Wolthuis: "Re: newby (very) question on XML DB theory"
Next in thread: Laconic2: "Re: Normalization by Composing, not just Decomposing"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message