Re: Proper siblings sorting in nested sets model

From: Laconic2 <laconic2_at_comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 13:44:38 -0400
Message-ID: <CtudnbZ_SIpGfevdRVn-iQ_at_comcast.com>

I do it vendor specific.

I express tree structures the traditional way, with keys for the child parent relationship. Then I use "CONNECT BY" to traverse the tree. As I'm traversing the tree, I fill in sequence numbers, pretty much like Joe Celko says to.

"CONNECT BY" is product specific. Too bad. I do it anyway. Received on Fri Apr 09 2004 - 19:44:38 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jan Hidders: "Re: How is this collection called?"
Previous message: Jan Hidders: "Re: Normalization by Composing, not just Decomposing"
In reply to: Pavel Schevaev: "Proper siblings sorting in nested sets model"
Next in thread: John Gilson: "Re: Proper siblings sorting in nested sets model"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message