Re: Idea for concurrent transactions
From: Mike Nicewarner <psyclo_at_nospam_datamodel.org>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 11:44:40 -0600
Message-ID: <c2vha5$cbu$1_at_news.netins.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 11:44:40 -0600
Message-ID: <c2vha5$cbu$1_at_news.netins.net>
YO JOE!!
-- Mike Nicewarner [TeamSybase] http://www.datamodel.org mike_at_nospam!datamodel.org Sybase product enhancement requests: http://www.isug.com/cgi-bin/ISUG2/submit_enhancement "--CELKO--" <joe.celko_at_northface.edu> wrote in message news:a264e7ea.0403101025.5f00e79d_at_posting.google.com...Received on Sat Mar 13 2004 - 18:44:40 CET
> >> Anyone have any references to papers that describe MVCC? <<
>
> There should be something from Jim Grey, sicne he was one of the big
> players in optmistic concurrency control and there is ATOMIC
> TRANSACTION by Lynch, et al (ISBN 1-55860-104-X).
>
> A third approach from Unisys was logical concurrency control;
> basically, the system sets up a queue of jobs, parses their
> predicates, find a subset of the jobs that do not interfere with each
> other (or perhaps can benefit by sharing data, like marerialized
> views), and lets them into the database at the same time. I have not
> seen any research papers in years on it, tho.