Re: Multiple specification of constraints

From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_golden.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 18:37:47 -0500
Message-ID: <Mvqdndiu5esUZc3d4p2dnA_at_golden.net>


"Mikito Harakiri" <mikharakiri_at_iahu.com> wrote in message news:7T24c.31$iI2.46_at_news.oracle.com...
>
> "Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_golden.net> wrote in message
> news:gZCdnelwN-P8Lc3dRVn-jg_at_golden.net...
> > We need to have logical identifiers. Once we have those, I fail to see a
> > problem.
>
> This contradicts to your earler statement (which I agree) that for every
> value there are multiple physical representations. Solving identity
problem
> among different symbolic representations is by no means a triivial task.
> What is "logical identifier" then?

The representation is irrelevant to the value. Received on Fri Mar 12 2004 - 00:37:47 CET

Original text of this message