Re: object algebra
From: Eric Kaun <ekaun_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 21:39:05 GMT
Message-ID: <ZVL3c.57624$rx7.25836_at_newssvr33.news.prodigy.com>
> "Jonathan Leffler" <jleffler_at_earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:ldy2c.22867$yZ1.3107_at_newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> > Neo wrote:
> > >Jonathan Leffler wrote:
> > >>Please can you explain the definition of a relation which you think
> > >>means that the RDM must create nulls? And can you give a reference to
> > >>where the version of the RDM you are using or assuming is defined? It
> > >>doesn't seem to be the same as the version(s) I'm used to.
>
> What happened to your promise? And I quote: "I've nearly reached the point
> of not responding, but I'll make one more attempt for good meaasure."
>
> One. Not two. Not any other number. Just one. You are already over the
> limit!
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 21:39:05 GMT
Message-ID: <ZVL3c.57624$rx7.25836_at_newssvr33.news.prodigy.com>
"Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_golden.net> wrote in message
news:j66dnU8i7du1xtLdRVn_iw_at_golden.net...
> "Jonathan Leffler" <jleffler_at_earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:ldy2c.22867$yZ1.3107_at_newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> > Neo wrote:
> > >Jonathan Leffler wrote:
> > >>Please can you explain the definition of a relation which you think
> > >>means that the RDM must create nulls? And can you give a reference to
> > >>where the version of the RDM you are using or assuming is defined? It
> > >>doesn't seem to be the same as the version(s) I'm used to.
>
> What happened to your promise? And I quote: "I've nearly reached the point
> of not responding, but I'll make one more attempt for good meaasure."
>
> One. Not two. Not any other number. Just one. You are already over the
> limit!
I think he derived his definition of One from a TDM/XDb "query", which means he's free to have it mean anything he likes. :-) Received on Wed Mar 10 2004 - 22:39:05 CET