Re: Testing Various Data Models?
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 17:17:35 -0600
Message-ID: <c2ljal$t18$1_at_news.netins.net>
"Christopher Browne" <cbbrowne_at_acm.org> wrote in message
news:c2lc12$1u5dr8$6_at_ID-125932.news.uni-berlin.de...
> Martha Stewart called it a Good Thing when "Dawn M. Wolthuis"
<dwolt_at_tincat-group.com> wrote:
> > "Mikito Harakiri" <mikharakiri_at_iahu.com> wrote in message
> > news:1Po3c.19$X%.150_at_news.oracle.com...
<snip>
> _You're_ the one who was proposing the grand announcement.
>
> Responsibility for having a strategy to evaluate the merits of
> alternatives therefore rests on you, not on anyone else.
Also, I'm quite certain that I am not the only one reading this news group that believes there are other non-relational models that hold significant advantages to companies employing them. So, no matter what model you think might be a good one, whether relational or not, how would you go about proving it to those who might wish to employ it? This isn't my issue -- it is an industry issue.
--dawn Received on Wed Mar 10 2004 - 00:17:35 CET