Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
From: Paul <paul_at_not.a.chance.ie>
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 00:40:52 -0000
Message-ID: <MPG.1ab291bd39a8f1c29898ec_at_news1.eircom.net>
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 00:40:52 -0000
Message-ID: <MPG.1ab291bd39a8f1c29898ec_at_news1.eircom.net>
andrewst_at_onetel.net.uk says...
> > > > It is a bit sad that the relational model is practically on its last leg
> > > > before it even has an implementation, eh? Or maybe that's the reason ... ?
> > > > [Just thought I'd show my true colors in case anyone has not realized that
> > > > there are some database theorists that are not relational zealots -- I among
> > > > them] smiles. --dawn
> > > Is it? What is the great new replacement then - Pick?
> > XML.
> That's very funny - intentionally, I hope!?
Take a look at my sig and I think that you'll see whether I was being serious or not!
Paul...
-- plinehan y_a_h_o_o and d_o_t com C++ Builder 5 SP1, Interbase 6.0.1.6 IBX 5.04 W2K Pro Please do not top-post. "XML avoids the fundamental question of what we should do, by focusing entirely on how we should do it." quote from http://www.metatorial.comReceived on Sat Mar 06 2004 - 01:40:52 CET