Re: Xquery might have some things right
From: Eric Kaun <ekaun_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 16:55:35 GMT
Message-ID: <bi22c.55867$%b5.36952_at_newssvr33.news.prodigy.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 16:55:35 GMT
Message-ID: <bi22c.55867$%b5.36952_at_newssvr33.news.prodigy.com>
"Dawn M. Wolthuis" <dwolt_at_tincat-group.com> wrote in message
news:c2aako$f4a$1_at_news.netins.net...
> I'll agree that XML is a teeny-tiny step for data exchange purposes, but
the
> services design pattern that just might emerge as a standard along with
XML
> documents does hold some promise, I think. Cheers! --dawn
I'd still like to hear a good definition for "services design pattern". I'm not being facetious... I'd just like to be clear on what differentiates services from other forms of remote call we've had in the past. Received on Fri Mar 05 2004 - 17:55:35 CET