Re: Xquery might have some things right
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 14:49:03 GMT
Message-ID: <zr02c.32190$XD3.7410_at_newssvr16.news.prodigy.com>
"Corey Brown" <corey_at_spectrumsoftware.net> wrote in message
news:Se02c.16672$JN2.13942_at_bignews4.bellsouth.net...
>
> "Eric Kaun" <ekaun_at_yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:dn%1c.55833$1O4.38437_at_newssvr33.news.prodigy.com...
> > "Corey Brown" <corey_at_spectrumsoftware.net> wrote in message
> > news:gZ_1c.46418$0l1.21653_at_bignews3.bellsouth.net...
> Sure, that's why you need an AAIS (application to application
interface specification),
> otherwise how will you define the contract between one system and the
other?
Definitely - my point was that XML doesn't absolve you of that responsibility.
> XML does have "some" advantanges. Here's a short list:
>
> - It's human readable. Developers can visually check on communications
between systems
> simply by taping into the communications channel. Great for
debugging too.
> - Senders and receivers don't have to be in perfect sync. That is,
information can be added
> at the transmitter that the receiver can simply ignore. This works
especially well in a publish
> subscribe scenario where the subscribers use the published output
in different ways.
- erk