Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:43:15 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <c27bpi$npm$1_at_titan.btinternet.com>
"Dawn M. Wolthuis" <dwolt_at_tincat-group.com> wrote in message
news:c27aj6$bkl$1_at_news.netins.net...
> "Roy Hann" <rhann_at_globalnet.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:c27717$d81$1_at_titan.btinternet.com...
> > "Dawn M. Wolthuis" <dwolt_at_tincat-group.com> wrote in message
> > news:c25ipv$bc9$1_at_news.netins.net...
> > > "Roy Hann" <rhann_at_globalnet.co.uk> wrote in message
> > > news:c25hm1$m7k$1_at_sparta.btinternet.com...
> >
> I said nothing that was in disagreement with this. "Advancing the
> discussion" is far from settling the matter. By the way, did you just
tell
> me how the dictionary defined "transistor"? Why in the world would you do
> that? Ah, I see, it was in order to advance the discussion.
> smiles. --dawn
Since you are so fond of dictionaries, look up "equivocation".
Roy Hann Received on Thu Mar 04 2004 - 14:43:15 CET