Re: Multiple specification of constraints

From: Marshall Spight <mspight_at_dnai.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 03:25:31 GMT
Message-ID: <Lkx1c.37232$PR3.737328@attbi_s03>

"Eric Kaun" <ekaun_at_yahoo.com> wrote in message news:eTs1c.55453$%S7.4251_at_newssvr33.news.prodigy.com...
> A relational language will buy you that... I agree with Bob that relations
> are not necessarily anything to do with persistence, although persisting
> them is useful for obvious reasons.

Actually, I think that it's mostly me blowing that particular horn.

Marshall Received on Wed Mar 03 2004 - 21:25:31 CST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Laura Hirsh: "Re: Codd provided appropriate mathematics ... (was Re: Relational and MV (response to "foundations of relational theory"))"
Previous message: Marshall Spight: "Re: Codd provided appropriate mathematics ... (was Re: Relational and MV (response to "foundations of relational theory"))"
In reply to: Eric Kaun: "Re: Multiple specification of constraints"
Next in thread: Eric Kaun: "Re: Multiple specification of constraints"
Reply: Eric Kaun: "Re: Multiple specification of constraints"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US