Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: relations aren't types?

Re: relations aren't types?

From: Marshall Spight <mspight_at_dnai.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 04:11:18 GMT
Message-ID: <GvJNb.64753$5V2.72075@attbi_s53> 





"Adrian Kubala" <adrian_at_sixfingeredman.net> wrote in message news:slrnc0cdli.99p.adrian_at_sixfingeredman.net...

>




> These aren't types you're talking about, according to standard CS

> definitions. A type has to have values.




"Bottom" (sometimes written _|_) is a type that has no values.




Marshall
Received on Thu Jan 15 2004 - 22:11:18 CST












Original text of this message













  HOME |
  ASK QUESTION |
  ADD INFO |
  SEARCH |
  E-MAIL US