comp.databases.theory: by thread

Re: relations aren't types? Alfredo Novoa (Sun Jan 11 2004 - 06:38:36 CST)
Re: relations aren't types? Bob Badour (Sun Jan 11 2004 - 12:51:27 CST)
Re: relations aren't types? John Jacob (Sun Jan 11 2004 - 01:38:07 CST)
- Re: relations aren't types? Adrian Kubala (Sun Jan 11 2004 - 17:18:52 CST)
  - Re: relations aren't types? Joe \ (Sun Jan 11 2004 - 19:30:19 CST)
  - Re: relations aren't types? John Jacob (Mon Jan 12 2004 - 00:14:39 CST)
    - Re: relations aren't types? Adrian Kubala (Mon Jan 12 2004 - 01:39:08 CST)
      - Re: relations aren't types? Marshall Spight (Mon Jan 12 2004 - 11:05:22 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Adrian Kubala (Mon Jan 12 2004 - 16:04:04 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Marshall Spight (Mon Jan 12 2004 - 23:00:58 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Adrian Kubala (Tue Jan 13 2004 - 00:32:57 CST)
      - Re: relations aren't types? Bob Badour (Mon Jan 12 2004 - 16:03:32 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Adrian Kubala (Mon Jan 12 2004 - 16:45:20 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Bob Badour (Mon Jan 12 2004 - 17:27:09 CST)
      - Re: relations aren't types? John Jacob (Mon Jan 12 2004 - 23:51:49 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Adrian Kubala (Tue Jan 13 2004 - 01:05:42 CST)
    - Re: relations aren't types? Adrian Kubala (Mon Jan 12 2004 - 16:47:56 CST)
      - Re: relations aren't types? John Jacob (Tue Jan 13 2004 - 00:13:10 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Adrian Kubala (Tue Jan 13 2004 - 01:47:38 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? John Jacob (Wed Jan 14 2004 - 00:11:20 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Adrian Kubala (Wed Jan 14 2004 - 02:17:56 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? John Jacob (Wed Jan 14 2004 - 21:43:47 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Joe \ (Wed Jan 14 2004 - 22:47:25 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Adrian Kubala (Thu Jan 15 2004 - 00:44:02 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Costin Cozianu (Thu Jan 15 2004 - 15:52:45 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? John Jacob (Thu Jan 15 2004 - 22:04:39 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Marshall Spight (Thu Jan 15 2004 - 22:11:18 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Bob Badour (Thu Jan 15 2004 - 23:18:05 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Adrian Kubala (Thu Jan 15 2004 - 23:21:30 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Marshall Spight (Fri Jan 16 2004 - 01:32:41 CST)
Re: What are we asking of a data model? SPeacock (Sun Jan 11 2004 - 15:16:56 CST)
- Re: What are we asking of a data model? Joe \ (Sun Jan 11 2004 - 17:16:16 CST)
  - Re: What are we asking of a data model? SPeacock (Sun Jan 11 2004 - 18:24:29 CST)
- Re: What are we asking of a data model? Bob Badour (Mon Jan 12 2004 - 16:10:07 CST)
  - Re: What are we asking of a data model? SPeacock (Mon Jan 12 2004 - 23:53:23 CST)
  - Re: What are we asking of a data model? Tom Hester (Tue Jan 13 2004 - 10:46:55 CST)
    - Re: What are we asking of a data model? Dawn M. Wolthuis (Tue Jan 13 2004 - 11:52:41 CST)
Re: What are we asking of a data model? Neo (Fri Jan 16 2004 - 19:50:57 CST)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right Adrian Kubala (Sun Jan 11 2004 - 16:05:56 CST)
- Re: Stored fields ordered left to right Dawn M. Wolthuis (Sun Jan 11 2004 - 21:06:01 CST)
  - Re: Stored fields ordered left to right Adrian Kubala (Mon Jan 12 2004 - 00:35:12 CST)
    - Re: Stored fields ordered left to right Dawn M. Wolthuis (Mon Jan 12 2004 - 04:28:56 CST)
      - Re: Stored fields ordered left to right Adrian Kubala (Mon Jan 12 2004 - 16:31:31 CST)
        
        Re: Stored fields ordered left to right Dawn M. Wolthuis (Mon Jan 12 2004 - 21:34:11 CST)
        
        Re: Stored fields ordered left to right Adrian Kubala (Tue Jan 13 2004 - 01:09:57 CST)
        
        Re: Stored fields ordered left to right Marshall Spight (Mon Jan 12 2004 - 23:30:07 CST)
        
        Re: Stored fields ordered left to right Adrian Kubala (Tue Jan 13 2004 - 01:56:12 CST)
        
        Re: Stored fields ordered left to right Dawn M. Wolthuis (Tue Jan 13 2004 - 08:13:24 CST)
        
        Re: Stored fields ordered left to right Adrian Kubala (Tue Jan 13 2004 - 14:25:20 CST)
        
        Re: Stored fields ordered left to right Dawn M. Wolthuis (Tue Jan 13 2004 - 18:03:23 CST)
        
        Re: Stored fields ordered left to right Dawn M. Wolthuis (Tue Jan 13 2004 - 22:06:25 CST)
        
        Re: Stored fields ordered left to right Adrian Kubala (Wed Jan 14 2004 - 00:53:33 CST)
        
        Re: Stored fields ordered left to right Dawn M. Wolthuis (Wed Jan 14 2004 - 11:42:48 CST)
        
        Re: Stored fields ordered left to right Adrian Kubala (Wed Jan 14 2004 - 17:36:40 CST)
        
        Re: Stored fields ordered left to right Dawn M. Wolthuis (Wed Jan 14 2004 - 18:14:12 CST)
        
        Re: Stored fields ordered left to right Adrian Kubala (Wed Jan 14 2004 - 19:41:49 CST)
        Re: Stored fields ordered left to right Bob Badour (Wed Jan 14 2004 - 20:09:53 CST)
        
        Re: Stored fields ordered left to right Dawn M. Wolthuis (Wed Jan 14 2004 - 20:24:24 CST)
- Re: Stored fields ordered left to right Bob Badour (Mon Jan 12 2004 - 16:07:33 CST)
Declarative, Procedural, Object-Oriented, ... Dawn M. Wolthuis (Sun Jan 11 2004 - 21:11:29 CST)
- Re: Declarative, Procedural, Object-Oriented, ... Joe \ (Sun Jan 11 2004 - 22:05:13 CST)
  - Re: Declarative, Procedural, Object-Oriented, ... Dawn M. Wolthuis (Sun Jan 11 2004 - 22:30:47 CST)
    - Re: Declarative, Procedural, Object-Oriented, ... Dawn M. Wolthuis (Mon Jan 12 2004 - 05:13:36 CST)
- Re: Declarative, Procedural, Object-Oriented, ... Tom Hester (Mon Jan 12 2004 - 10:21:21 CST)