Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: Stored fields ordered left to right

Re: Stored fields ordered left to right

From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_golden.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 00:25:17 -0500
Message-ID: <uMGdnc3Q4J94J3KiRVn-uw@golden.net>


"Marshall Spight" <mspight_at_dnai.com> wrote in message news:LaJHb.687449$Fm2.593735_at_attbi_s04...
> "Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_golden.net> wrote in message
news:ON6dnTDvsbMQAHOiRVn-hg_at_golden.net...
> >
> > Mathematical relations do not rely on attribute order. The physical
> > representation of mathematical relations using written symbols on planar
> > surfaces conventionally uses attribute order for succinctness.
>
> This doesn't seem correct to me.
>
> Consider the union of two sets of ordered pairs:
>
> { (1,2) }
> union
> { (2,1) }
>
> The union of those sets is a set with two elements, yes? How
> are we distinguishing between (1,2) and (2,1) if not by order?

The order is implicit in the physical representation.

> Is there some hidden information?

Yes. The semantics of the pairs. Why is the first one { (1,2) } and not { (2,1) } ?

The order in which we choose to list the dimensions is entirely arbitrary. Received on Sun Dec 28 2003 - 23:25:17 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US