Path: newssvr20.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!prodigy.com!rip!news.webusenet.com!feed3.newsreader.com!newsreader.com!border2.nntp.ash.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ash.giganews.com!firehose2!nntp4!intern1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nntp.golden.net!news.golden.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 03:05:16 -0600
From: "Bob Badour" <bbadour@golden.net>
Newsgroups: comp.databases.theory
References: <bsira5$jlt$1@news.netins.net> <VBhHb.671183$Tr4.1678668@attbi_s03> <v6mdnQYXkoaxl3OiRVn-uw@golden.net> <bsl23t$5ih$1@news.netins.net> <e9d83568.0312272356.6b916a15@posting.google.com>
Subject: Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 04:04:56 -0500
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Message-ID: <wLadnalFBMpQAXOi4p2dnA@golden.net>
Lines: 29
NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.35.144.163
X-Trace: sv3-L2h6DW1ui8Jw1vHWvP26uv7K/xuhxs13EEftarN0mHb8vYqvqWcBM/DkWtogfQiQXjBvj5lN/4F/PK+!oB55DOFOGAm/HKuT9hzJJETK1fDGTQPxiUbY0BYJxSTZzvkXJ1srHwuxWtAlbCjNsVaErKEM3Q==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@golden.net
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@golden.net
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.1
Xref: newssvr20.news.prodigy.com comp.databases.theory:23113

"Lauri Pietarinen" <lauri.pietarinen@atbusiness.com> wrote in message
news:e9d83568.0312272356.6b916a15@posting.google.com...
> "Dawn M. Wolthuis" <dwolt@tincat-group.com> wrote in message
news:<bsl23t$5ih$1@news.netins.net>...
> > Do you agree, Bob, that relational database theory seems to require
> > constructs that are NOT mathematical relations (because they have no
logical
> > ordering among attributes)?
> >
> > Do you also agree that some of the data models that are not considered
by
> > relational theorists to be relational are, in this way, actually MORE
> > relational in that they do require logical constructs (ordered tuples)
that
> > correspond to mathematical relations?
> >
> > This is one of several issues I'm trying to square away or at least get
a
> > vocabulary that is not so contradictory.  Thanks  --dawn

Apparently, Dawn does not realise she has been in my twit-filter for months
now.

For anyone who doesn't know, ignore Dawn--she's an idiot. Mathematical
relations do not have any particular attribute order. The physical
representation of mathematical relations using written symbols on planar
surfaces relies on physical order for succinctness.


