| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: Is relational theory irrelevant? (was Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL)
"Marshall Spight" <mspight_at_dnai.com> wrote in message
news:tCCsb.137796$ao4.438707_at_attbi_s51...
> "Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_golden.net> wrote in message
news:COydnd-jwepVXC-iRVn-hQ_at_golden.net...
> > "Marshall Spight" <mspight_at_dnai.com> wrote in message
> > news:Vftsb.179962$HS4.1498393_at_attbi_s01...
> > > "Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_golden.net> wrote in message
> > news:VaWdndbrNqgr0y-iRVn-jg_at_golden.net...
> > > >
> > > > Relations have no order. The values in relations have order. An
ordered
> > > > structure, like an array for instance, involves physical order.
> > >
> > > Why? Why can't you have logical order?
> >
> > > >> > >
> > > In fact, this is closer to what I understand of order in the
> > > math textbooks I read. An ordered relation is a pair:
> > >
> > > (relation, ordering function)
> > >
> > > How is that physical?
I don't disagree. ;-) Received on Wed Nov 12 2003 - 22:00:26 CST
![]() |
![]() |