Bob Badour wrote:
> "Steve Lancour" <stevel_at_lancour.com> wrote in message
> news:CsGdnZoN95XJJjyiRVn-jw_at_comcast.com...
>
>>Mikito Harakiri wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"Steve Lancour" <stevel_at_lancour.com> wrote in message
>>>news:mKudnYI38-U5KTyiRVn-gw_at_comcast.com...
>>>
>>>
>>>>No, I postulate only one mistake. If the DBA makes a mistake in setting
>>>>up the constraint the applications may be perfect and yet still corrupt
>>>>data. Same as if there were a mistake in the example Pick code I
>
> posted.
>
>>>
>>>A mistake in high abstraction language is much less likely then in low
>
> level
>
>>>language.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>I don't know. Perhaps. But if we can agree that the QA efforts on both
>
>
> We cannot agree on that point. There are too many database operations that
> never go through QA.
>
>
Perhaps in systems you've built but not in mine.
Received on Fri Oct 31 2003 - 09:20:24 CST
