Re: SQL Implementation

From: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne_at_acm.org>
Date: 5 Oct 2003 23:12:33 GMT
Message-ID: <blq8h0$fbg2m$1@ID-125932.news.uni-berlin.de>

In the last exciting episode, bbadour_at_golden.net (Bob Badour) wrote:
> "Ryan" <rgaffuri_at_cox.net> wrote in message news:<fQleb.32913$0Z5.25360_at_lakeread03>...
>> How well do todays databases implement SQL99? I dont think any are
>> certified. Will they be?
>
> More importantly, why would you want them to implement SQL99 ?

Presumably because it was a more recent and more "functional" set of specifications than the previous standards.

Perhaps you think it a poor idea to implement SQL99; it would warrant explaining why...

-- 
If this was helpful, <http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=cbbrowne> rate me
http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/linuxdistributions.html
"When we write programs that "learn", it turns out that we do and they
don't." -- Alan Perlis

Received on Sun Oct 05 2003 - 18:12:33 CDT