Re: Values have types ??

From: Marshall Spight <mspight_at_dnai.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 18:17:12 GMT
Message-ID: <HQ0bb.532712$uu5.88375@sccrnsc04>

"Costin Cozianu" <c_cozianu_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message news:bjlmoc$khtj2$1_at_ID-152540.news.uni-berlin.de...

> Do you want the type system for the primitive values to be different
> from the type system for relations, arrays and other "complex" types ?

Different how?

It's not clear to me that a good system for user defined types (or scalars or classes or whatever one wants to call them) is also good system for relation types. There are differences that I don't know how to reconcile.

Then again, I'm still reading a lot of books, so maybe I'll come across something.

Marshall Received on Sat Sep 20 2003 - 13:17:12 CDT