Re: Corrected definition of locally invertible transformation

From: Mikito Harakiri <mikharakiri_at_ywho.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 16:00:08 -0700
Message-ID: <tEr9b.34$lB2.178@news.oracle.com>

"Jan Hidders" <jan.hidders_at_pandora.be> wrote in message news:dSq9b.22183$Sp4.1459250_at_phobos.telenet-ops.be...
> Mikito Harakiri wrote:
> > Given
> >
> > Q * D = V
> >
> > Q is called locally invertible if there doesn't exist D' != D, such that
> >
> > Q * D' = V
>
> Right! Just to be absolutely sure let me verify the folllowing:
>
> "globally invertable" = "injective"
>
> Right?

Absolutely. Received on Mon Sep 15 2003 - 18:00:08 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Vadim Tropashko: "Yet another tree labeling"
Previous message: --CELKO--: "Re: More pain and sufferring with Tropashko's materialized path..."
In reply to: Jan Hidders: "Re: Corrected definition of locally invertible transformation"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US