Re: Possible problems with Date & McGoveran View Updating

From: Jan Hidders <jan.hidders_at_pandora.be>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 18:01:47 GMT
Message-ID: <f8n9b.21901$fy3.1381448@phobos.telenet-ops.be>

Alfredo Novoa wrote:

> Jan Hidders <jan.hidders_at_pandora.be> wrote in message
> news:<Ym%8b.20114$7y3.1376399_at_phobos.telenet-ops.be>...
>

>> By the way, what is exactly your definition of "updatable"? Should there
>> be at least one instance and one update such that the result is
>> well-defined, or should for all instances all updates be definied, or
>> something in between?

>
> IMO "updatable view" is a bad term. It has the same sense as "updatable
> table".

That's why we have definitions. What is yours?

Jan Hidders

Received on Mon Sep 15 2003 - 13:01:47 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Robin Tucker: "More pain and sufferring with Tropashko's materialized path..."
Previous message: Jan Hidders: "Re: Possible problems with Date & McGoveran View Updating"
In reply to: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: Possible problems with Date & McGoveran View Updating"
Next in thread: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: Possible problems with Date & McGoveran View Updating"
Reply: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: Possible problems with Date & McGoveran View Updating"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US