Re: does a table always need a PK?
From: Lee Fesperman <firstsql_at_ix.netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 20:30:16 GMT
Message-ID: <3F4E65C5.61B5_at_ix.netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 20:30:16 GMT
Message-ID: <3F4E65C5.61B5_at_ix.netcom.com>
=?iso-8859-1?q?Leandro_Guimar=E3es_Faria_Corsetti_Dutra?= wrote:
>
> Em Wed, 27 Aug 2003 09:00:49 +0000, Lee Fesperman escreveu:
>
> > what I colloquially call the 'Tasmania' Relational Model of Data
>
> Are you referring to RM/T, of wich RMv2 was a subset?
Sorry, I should have mentioned RM/T as a common name for it.
-- Lee Fesperman, FirstSQL, Inc. (http://www.firstsql.com) ============================================================== * The Ultimate DBMS is here! * FirstSQL/J Object/Relational DBMS (http://www.firstsql.com)Received on Thu Aug 28 2003 - 22:30:16 CEST