Re: does a table always need a PK?
From: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne_at_acm.org>
Date: 27 Aug 2003 20:00:36 GMT
Message-ID: <bij2l3$9tgnj$3_at_ID-125932.news.uni-berlin.de>
Date: 27 Aug 2003 20:00:36 GMT
Message-ID: <bij2l3$9tgnj$3_at_ID-125932.news.uni-berlin.de>
Centuries ago, Nostradamus foresaw when "Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_golden.net> would write:
> Even still, I find it unforgivable for someone to implement a
> self-proclaimed rdbms and not have any familiarity with this book. It is
> unforgivable for someone to claim an opinion on what constitutes an rdbms
> and not even know what 4VL is.
I haven't seen any opinion being expressed, on the "MySQL side," as to what they think constitutes an RDBMS.
Certainly nothing resembling the "Peano Axioms" that the MySQL guy seems to think _everyone else_ should consider as the level of discourse.
-- "cbbrowne","_at_","ntlug.org" http://cbbrowne.com/info/ "misfortune, n. The kind of fortune that never misses." -- Ambrose Bierce, The Devil's DictionaryReceived on Wed Aug 27 2003 - 22:00:36 CEST