Re: does a table always need a PK?

From: Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra <lgcdutra_at_terra.com.br>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 13:21:19 +0200
Message-Id: <pan.2003.08.27.11.21.17.795708@terra.com.br>

On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 08:44:11 +0000, Lee Fesperman wrote:

> FirstSQL/J is not yet compliant with all of Codd's 12 Rules. However, we are improving
> in that area and are the only DBMS vendor dedicated to relational fidelity. It's on our
> to-do list!

Great! Do you have a timeline for Codd's 12 rules, then for RMv2, then for RM/T? It's a tall order... anyway, for whatever it's worth, I think I'll give you a place at
http://dmoz.org./Computers/Software/Databases/Relational/Implementations/.

Then we could have competition on merits: D4 against FirstSQL... I must confess I'd be hard pressed to choose between a D and a portable RM/T... perhaps the first to GPL its product would win me!

-- 
 _   Leandro GuimarÃ£es Faria Corsetti Dutra     +41 (21) 648 11 34
/ \  http://br.geocities.com./lgcdutra/         +41 (78) 778 11 34
\ /  Answer to the list, not to me directly!    +55 (11) 5686 2219
/ \  Rate this if helpful: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=leandro

Received on Wed Aug 27 2003 - 06:21:19 CDT