Re: does a table always need a PK?
From: Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra <lgcdutra_at_terra.com.br>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 13:16:37 +0200
Message-ID: <pan.2003.08.27.11.16.37.585838_at_terra.com.br>
>
> Give the guy a break; he is dead after all. Try the library or one of the
> used book dealers.
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 13:16:37 +0200
Message-ID: <pan.2003.08.27.11.16.37.585838_at_terra.com.br>
Em Tue, 26 Aug 2003 20:21:16 -0400, Bob Badour escreveu:
>> > See RM V2.
>>
> http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/isbnInquiry.asp?isbn=0201141922&
>> > itm=1 >> >> The book is selling too well: "Not Currently Available.
>
> Give the guy a break; he is dead after all. Try the library or one of the
> used book dealers.
Being dead is not an excuse... actually I have the book, and it is not so great. If you look enough, perhaps in the Relation Database volumes, Date himself has a negative review of it. It was a trial at digesting the relational principles and corolaries, plus some assorted ideals about DBMSs, to PHBs in charge of DBMS systems development.
_TTM_ IMNSHO is a better foundation for RDBMS guidelines.
-- _ Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra +41 (21) 648 11 34 / \ http://br.geocities.com./lgcdutra/ +41 (78) 778 11 34 \ / Responda à lista, não a mim diretamente! +55 (11) 5686 2219 / \ Dê nota se ajudei: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=leandroReceived on Wed Aug 27 2003 - 13:16:37 CEST