Re: Is mysql a RDBMS ?

From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_golden.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 16:58:23 -0400
Message-ID: <KAw1b.427$dE7.63010940_at_mantis.golden.net>


"Morten Gulbrandsen" <Morten.Gulbrandsen_at_rwth-aachen.de> wrote in message news:60ca69db.0308220321.12a7857b_at_posting.google.com...
> Leandro GuimarĂ£es Faria Corsetti Dutra <lgcdutra_at_terra.com.br> wrote in
message news:<pan.2003.08.21.22.38.11.649468_at_terra.com.br>...
> > Em Thu, 21 Aug 2003 01:16:04 -0700, Morten Gulbrandsen escreveu:
> >
> > > Which open source products can offer this and hence qualify for being
> > > an RDBMS or even ANSI SQL compatibility ?
> >
> > PostgreSQL, FireBird and SAP db strive to be full-fledged SQL
> > DBMSs.
> >
> > But SQL is not relational.
>
> Pardon ?
>
> if ANSI SQL standard is not documenting an RDBMS,
> what is then relational ?

A database management system that represents all data as values in relations.

> Where can I get more information about FireBird, SAP db ?

I suggest you contact the respective vendors.

> What is the main differences between Oracle, MySQL and PostGres ?

Ask any three people that question and you will get twelve different answers.

> I sometimes believe that MySQL has to be combined with another Language,
> in order to be an RDBMS,

MySQL is a simple file processing tool. It would have to become a full data management system that prohibits subversion to become any kind of dbms.

> Yours sincerely
>
> Morten Gulbrandsen
Received on Fri Aug 22 2003 - 22:58:23 CEST

Original text of this message