Re: Single Photon Data Types
Date: 30 Jul 2003 19:35:02 -0700
Message-ID: <bdf69bdf.0307301835.12f6de8e_at_posting.google.com>
"Dave Ulmer" <daveulmer_at_ccwebster.net> wrote in message news:<bg9ag3$mdbe1$1_at_ID-186663.news.uni-berlin.de>...
> "Mikito Harakiri" <mikharakiri_at_ywho.com> wrote in message
> news:N3WVa.34$T61.774_at_news.oracle.com...
> > Energy is a function of Frequency. Are you aware of Plank constant?
>
> Yep, actually photons are a bit puzzling but still Energy and Frequency are
> two distinctly different types of data.
This group got a wierd traffic lately: Astrologists, Alchemists, i wonder who is next.
Anyway, if anybody cares, I dislike types and classes for the reason you explicitly stated. People feel that inventing new types costs nothing, so that they mindlessly are creating ones. The real cost is, however, that the abstraction is lost, and redundancy is introduced. Received on Thu Jul 31 2003 - 04:35:02 CEST