Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad"

From: Paul Vernon <paul.vernon_at_ukk.ibmm.comm>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 17:24:44 +0100
Message-ID: <b9gks7$3ki0$1@gazette.almaden.ibm.com>

"Marshall Spight" <mspight_at_dnai.com> wrote in message news:4cPua.788670$L1.222709_at_sccrnsc02...
> "Paul Vernon" <paul.vernon_at_ukk.ibmm.comm> wrote in message
news:b9fvd8$19ru$1_at_gazette.almaden.ibm.com...
> > [...]
>
> Thanks for the explanation. That makes sense.
>
>
> > Transactions that are atomic in time are just not transactions at all in
any
> > meaningful sense
>
>
> Do you have an alternate name for them? (Admittedly a less important
> question.) "Whole-DBvar updates?"

<Shrug>

Take your pick:

    Nested Updates
    Intstant Transactions
    dbvar update

Regards
Paul Vernon
Business Intelligence, IBM Global Services Received on Fri May 09 2003 - 11:24:44 CDT

Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss