comp.databases.theory: by thread

9 messages: Starting Sun Mar 16 2003 - 00:39:10 CST, Ending Sun Mar 16 2003 - 02:36:18 CST
This period: Most recent messages
sort by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ] [ subject ]
Other periods:[ Previous, Thread view ] [ Next, Thread view ] [ List of Folders ]
Nearby: [ About this archive ] [ Other mail archives ]

Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Lauri Pietarinen (Sun Mar 16 2003 - 17:26:33 CST)
- Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Bob Badour (Sun Mar 16 2003 - 23:07:46 CST)
  - Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? --CELKO-- (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 17:54:33 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Jan Hidders (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 15:21:28 CST)
Re: Database design Woody (Sun Mar 16 2003 - 02:36:18 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By") Peter Koch Larsen (Sun Mar 16 2003 - 05:39:56 CST)
- Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By") Bob Badour (Sun Mar 16 2003 - 10:55:10 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By") Mikito Harakiri (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 12:55:57 CST)
Re: db design question Peter Johal (Sun Mar 16 2003 - 15:56:02 CST)
Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra Steve Kass (Sun Mar 16 2003 - 00:39:10 CST)
Like to Discuss Weather?-Come Join! Heres our Newsletter for Sunday! WeatherForums (Sun Mar 16 2003 - 01:42:55 CST)
what's the difference between 'concurrent' and 'parallel'; hayseed (Sun Mar 16 2003 - 07:33:31 CST)