Oracle FAQ
Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME
|
ASK QUESTION
|
ADD INFO
|
SEARCH
|
E-MAIL US
Home
->
Community
->
Usenet
->
comp.databases.theory
-> by thread
comp.databases.theory: by thread
46 messages
:
Starting
Thu Mar 13 2003 - 00:20:34 CST,
Ending
Thu Mar 13 2003 - 23:31:16 CST
This period
:
Most recent messages
sort by
: [ thread ] [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
]
Other periods
:[
Previous, Thread view
] [
Next, Thread view
] [
List of Folders
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 00:34:51 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 00:20:34 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 08:36:52 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 13:24:36 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 16:42:55 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 21:55:06 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
--CELKO--
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 18:46:09 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Sun Mar 16 2003 - 17:26:33 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Sun Mar 16 2003 - 23:07:46 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
--CELKO--
(Mon Mar 17 2003 - 17:54:33 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 15:21:28 CST)
Re: DB Design Principles for RDBMS
RayD
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 15:48:46 CST)
Re: DB Design Principles for RDBMS
Richard Wheeldon
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 18:22:01 CST)
Re: DB Design Principles for RDBMS
Larry Coon
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 12:59:31 CST)
Re: Logically model never possible real world or my forever imperfect business?
Mike Sherrill
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 12:03:37 CST)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
Cimarron Taylor
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 12:09:37 CST)
Re: Help!
Theo Peterbroers
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 03:38:05 CST)
Why using "Group By"
oferbu
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 04:07:14 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Damjan S. Vujnović
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 05:58:41 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 11:05:00 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Tony
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 11:20:55 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Damjan S. Vujnović
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 12:57:46 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 13:43:04 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 11:32:14 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Damjan S. Vujnović
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 13:23:32 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 14:02:15 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 12:31:25 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 12:36:04 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 12:43:50 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 13:40:19 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 14:18:14 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 15:02:59 CST)
SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 16:07:52 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 16:20:46 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 16:56:13 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 20:52:57 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Tibor Karaszi
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 11:53:00 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Bob Badour
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 12:21:16 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Peter Koch Larsen
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 12:51:59 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Bob Badour
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 13:01:55 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Peter Koch Larsen
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 06:44:19 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Bob Badour
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 09:52:44 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Peter Koch Larsen
(Sun Mar 16 2003 - 05:39:56 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Bob Badour
(Sun Mar 16 2003 - 10:55:10 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Mikito Harakiri
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 12:55:57 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Bob Badour
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 13:16:02 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Mikito Harakiri
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 14:42:47 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Bob Badour
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 22:41:33 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Mikito Harakiri
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 23:41:48 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Bob Badour
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 01:06:07 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
--CELKO--
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 18:35:10 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Mikito Harakiri
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 19:18:09 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Bob Badour
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 23:59:31 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Mikito Harakiri
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 01:41:11 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Bob Badour
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 01:50:52 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 13:37:50 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 13:57:29 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 14:42:34 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 14:48:58 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 15:15:10 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 15:13:06 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 15:36:07 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 16:03:04 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 16:32:57 CST)
Data management principles (formerly Why using "Group By")
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 21:27:20 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Larry Coon
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 15:43:23 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 16:05:42 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 15:18:53 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 15:49:54 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
stu
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 05:03:37 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Bob Badour
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 09:54:49 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
oferbu
(Mon Mar 17 2003 - 00:32:22 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Bob Badour
(Mon Mar 17 2003 - 11:10:05 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Mikito Harakiri
(Mon Mar 17 2003 - 19:40:38 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Jonathan Leffler
(Mon Mar 17 2003 - 23:16:38 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
--CELKO--
(Mon Mar 17 2003 - 18:28:55 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Peter Koch Larsen
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 04:24:01 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
GoranG
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 05:14:43 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Tony
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 08:43:50 CST)
unique primary key shared between multiple tables.
ben
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 23:31:16 CST)
Last message date
:
Thu Mar 13 2003 - 23:31:16 CST
Archived on
: Fri Apr 16 2004 - 01:42:34 CDT
46 messages
sort by
: [ thread ] [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
]
Other periods
:[
Previous, Thread view
] [
Next, Thread view
] [
List of Folders
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
HOME
|
ASK QUESTION
|
ADD INFO
|
SEARCH
|
E-MAIL US