Re: oracle sequence numbers

From: Pablo Sanchez <pablo_at_dev.null>
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 14:42:52 -0600
Message-ID: <Xns93078B83B19B3pingottpingottbah@216.166.71.233>

"Tibor Karaszi" <tibor_not_pressed_ham_.karaszi_at_cornerstone.se> wrote in news:wrcW9.6554$FF4.400903_at_newsb.telia.net:

> "Pablo Sanchez" <pablo_at_dev.null> wrote in message
> news:Xns9306A51F9C83Fpingottpingottbah_at_216.166.71.233...

>>

> If course, since fractions isn't mandatory and precision is implementation
> defines, one should be very careful...
>

Agreed! Which means I'd rather use the vendor's built-in support first, then build a sequence table array second if the vendor doesn't support it.

-- 
Pablo Sanchez, High-Performance Database Engineering
http://www.hpdbe.com

Received on Sat Jan 18 2003 - 14:42:52 CST