Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: Parts explosion with repeated subtrees

Re: Parts explosion with repeated subtrees

From: --CELKO-- <71062.1056_at_compuserve.com>
Date: 19 Dec 2002 10:53:01 -0800
Message-ID: <c0d87ec0.0212191053.1d7e2211@posting.google.com>


>> In short, SQL is a high abstraction language. It is difficult to do
stupid things in the high level language. <<

Difficult, not impossible. I have more faith in stupid people than you do <g>!!

>> Counter examples please. <<

Code with a cursor to update a table that could have been written with a single SQL statement.

Or go to www.dbdebunk.com and read the some of the quotes.

>> Damn, that's a good topic! <<

I think so too.

>> ... the same errors seem to keep on cropping up. <<

which is why a book would work --if they were making new exciting errors, I could not compile them.

>> I suppose, if you called it something like "SQL from Dummies",
you'd get
sued. <<

The DUMMIES people threaten us when the first edition of SQL FOR SMARTIES came out. Welcome to America, the country with 1 lawyer for ecvery 400 citizens! Received on Thu Dec 19 2002 - 12:53:01 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US