Re: Other tree representations in SQL [inorder]
From: --CELKO-- <71062.1056_at_compuserve.com>
Date: 4 Dec 2002 13:50:40 -0800
Message-ID: <c0d87ec0.0212041350.6b789418_at_posting.google.com>
Date: 4 Dec 2002 13:50:40 -0800
Message-ID: <c0d87ec0.0212041350.6b789418_at_posting.google.com>
>> If we try to represent those trees using the suggested model, we'll
find out
that they share the same representation. So, this approach works only
with binary trees... <<
Very neat counter-example! Received on Wed Dec 04 2002 - 22:50:40 CET