Re: Other tree representations in SQL [inorder]

From: --CELKO-- <71062.1056_at_compuserve.com>
Date: 4 Dec 2002 13:50:40 -0800
Message-ID: <c0d87ec0.0212041350.6b789418_at_posting.google.com>


>> If we try to represent those trees using the suggested model, we'll
find out
that they share the same representation. So, this approach works only with binary trees... <<

Very neat counter-example! Received on Wed Dec 04 2002 - 22:50:40 CET

Original text of this message