Re: which softeware can create database?

From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_golden.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 21:56:13 -0500
Message-ID: <a8_z9.295$CR4.163121292_at_radon.golden.net>


"Jan Hidders" <hidders_at_REMOVE.THIS.uia.ua.ac.be> wrote in message news:3dd02165$1_at_news.uia.ac.be...
> Bob Badour wrote:
> >"Jan Hidders" <hidders_at_REMOVE.THIS.uia.ua.ac.be> wrote in message
> >news:3dcfc379$1_at_news.uia.ac.be...
> >> Bob Badour wrote:
> >> >"Jan Hidders" <hidders_at_REMOVE.THIS.uia.ua.ac.be> wrote in message
> >> >news:3dcdf5e2$1_at_news.uia.ac.be...
> >> >> Bob Badour wrote:
> >> >> >"Jan Hidders" <hidders_at_REMOVE.THIS.uia.ua.ac.be> wrote in message
> >> >> >news:3dcc2530$1_at_news.uia.ac.be...
> >> >> >>
> >> >How is that possible if publishing in peer reviewed journals would
have
> >> >created "a wider acceptance of the specific use of certain terms in
the
> >> >scientific community and with that in the database community at large"
?
> >>
> >> It is what gains you the respect of the scientific community. The more
you
> >> publish that way the more political clout you have.
> >
> >I could not disagree more.
>
> I work in that community and probably know it better than you do.

Perhaps. I believe you also work in academia. Perhaps your subjective involvement with both prevents you from seeing either objectively.

> >> >> >BTW, is SIGMOD peer-reviewed ?
> >> >>
> >> >> I presume you mean SIGMOD record? Some parts of it.
> >> >>
> >> >> >http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/darwen95third.html
> >> >>
> >> >> Is that all you could find? Here, let me help you a little:
> >> >
> >> >No, I just grabbed the first one I found.
> >>
> >> And failed. That was not in the peer-reviewed part.
> >
> >And failed at what?
>
> Finding a peer-reviewed publication of Date.

Since that was never my goal, I guess my failure is unsurprizing. Did I succeed at my goal of demonstrating that those who read peer reviewed database management journals have Date's work placed in front of them from time to time? Or have cause to know who Date is? If they choose to ignore something because it was not peer reviewed, they do so willfully, and willful ignorance is no excuse.

>

> -- Jan Hidders

> Received on Tue Nov 12 2002 - 03:56:13 CET

Original text of this message