Re: Requirements for update languages?

From: Alfredo Novoa <alfredo_at_nospam_ncs.es>
Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2002 13:25:56 GMT
Message-ID: <3dcd0cd7.5337444_at_news.wanadoo.es>

On Fri, 08 Nov 2002 18:02:56 +0100,
=?windows-1252?Q?Leandro_Guimar=E3es_Faria_Corsetti_Dutra?= <lgcdutra_at_terra.com.br> wrote:

> OTOH there is this new idea from Date that transactions are an
>unnecessary complication because we should just have atomic statements
>that make all the transaction's updates in parallel.

Can you give references?

In the Third Manifesto, transaction support is still one of the prescriptions. Received on Sat Nov 09 2002 - 14:25:56 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: K.Y. Fung: "Column name in view"
Previous message: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: Requirements for update languages?"
Maybe in reply to: Jens Lechtenbörger: "Requirements for update languages?"
In reply to Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra: "Re: Requirements for update languages?"
Next in thread: Jan Hidders: "Re: database design method"
Reply: Bob Badour: "Re: Requirements for update languages?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message