Re: SQL1999-standard makes no reference to term "relational" - why?
From: Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra <lgcdutra_at_terra.com.br>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:38:24 +0100
Message-ID: <apm30g$2qh18$1_at_ID-148886.news.dfncis.de>
> In the old days, it was simple. We had the FIPS-127 Conformance test
> suite. If your product could pass that suite of tests correctly, you
> got a certificate from NIST and your could bid for Federal Contracts.
> Unfortunately, Bill Clinton dropped this program for a few campaign
> donations.
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:38:24 +0100
Message-ID: <apm30g$2qh18$1_at_ID-148886.news.dfncis.de>
--CELKO-- wrote:
>
> In the old days, it was simple. We had the FIPS-127 Conformance test
> suite. If your product could pass that suite of tests correctly, you
> got a certificate from NIST and your could bid for Federal Contracts.
> Unfortunately, Bill Clinton dropped this program for a few campaign
> donations.
That's a most interesting piece of information. Are there references to substantiate it? Like a write-up anywhere in the Web, or a trade press article or whatever?
-- _ / \ Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra +41 (21) 216 15 93 \ / http://homepage.mac.com./leandrod/ fax +41 (21) 216 19 04 X http://tutoriald.sourceforge.net./ Orange Communications CH / \ Campanha fita ASCII, contra correio HTML +41 (21) 644 23 01Received on Tue Oct 29 2002 - 14:38:24 CET