Re: Business-logic in 3-tier architecture

From: Tobin Harris <comedyharris_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 11:31:14 -0000
Message-ID: <aplri4$2okl0$1_at_ID-135366.news.dfncis.de>


Came across this link, where Microsoft discuss where to but business logic...

http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dndotnet/ht ml/DesignNetApp.asp

HTH Tobin

"Arthur Yeo" <ayeo_at_acm.org> wrote in message news:I73p9.29456$7I6.92391_at_rwcrnsc52.ops.asp.att.net...
> Theoretically, everyone knows that business logic is supposed to be in the
> middle-tier according to the 3-tier architecture. This seems to be
> counter-intuitive to Active Database concepts such as putting business
logic
> in triggers with help from store procedures in the DBMS (which are all in
> the 3rd-tier of the 3-tier architecture.)
>
> Question: do you guys know of any guidelines (or may be even stds)
proposed
> to decide when certain business logic is better put in the backend (DB
> triggers/stored procedures)?
>
> Cheers,
> Arthur
>
>
>
Received on Tue Oct 29 2002 - 12:31:14 CET

Original text of this message