Re: The Practical Benefits of the Relational Model

From: Paul Vernon <paul.vernon_at_ukk.ibmm.comm>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 11:19:52 +0100
Message-ID: <aojehe$v0o$1_at_sp15at20.hursley.ibm.com>


"Lauri Pietarinen" <lauri.pietarinen_at_atbusiness.com> wrote in message news:3DAC627B.813F603C_at_atbusiness.com...
>
> What do you have in mind for replacing the functionality of transactions?

Multiple assignment, or more correctly dbvar assignment.

(dbvar = [the] database variable)

Plus the use of local/temporary/database relvars to allow sets of data can be built up over time, then be added to the 'main' database in one single multiple assignment.

Plus any 'locking' functionality required via database constraints.

But do note that I did not say you don't need transactions under the covers, of course we do. Just that database *users* should not be exposed to such damaging complexity.

Regards
Paul Vernon
Business Intelligence, IBM Global Services Received on Wed Oct 16 2002 - 12:19:52 CEST

Original text of this message