Re: Database naming convention (yet another post of it, but a bit different)

From: Paul Vernon <paul.vernon_at_ukk.ibmm.comm>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 19:34:40 +0100
Message-ID: <ao1tcn$14pq$1_at_sp15at20.hursley.ibm.com>

>If two columns have the same name, they should be drawn
> from the same domain.

Absolutely. Now if only we could place constraints on the system catalog to enforce that kind of rule (plus have proper domain support in SQL of course)

column_name -> domain

{ck_column_names} -> table

Regards
Paul Vernon
Business Intelligence, IBM Global Services Received on Wed Oct 09 2002 - 20:34:40 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: David Cressey: "Re: Database naming convention (yet another post of it, but a bit different)"
Previous message: Nathan Allan: "Re: The Practical Benefits of the Relational Model"
Maybe in reply to: Petruza: "Database naming convention (yet another post of it, but a bit different)"
In reply to David Cressey: "Re: Database naming convention (yet another post of it, but a bit different)"
Next in thread: David Cressey: "Re: Database naming convention (yet another post of it, but a bit different)"
Reply: David Cressey: "Re: Database naming convention (yet another post of it, but a bit different)"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message