Re: Structural similarity search in trees

From: Michele Ouellet <ouellmi_at_tvideotron.ca>
Date: 12 Jul 2002 09:10:21 -0500
Message-ID: <NkAX8.24483$e46.1002237_at_wagner.videotron.net>


I read a paper recently where someone was working on federating ontologies on the Web; one subproblem was matching subtrees and they used Gentner's Similarity Mapping Engine for this. Perhaps this link would help:

http://www.qrg.ils.nwu.edu/ideas/smeidea.htm

Michèle Ouellet

<Kai.Grossjohann_at_CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE> wrote in message news:vaf4rfe5ko8.fsf_at_lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de...
> Suppose I have a collection of labeled ordered trees (vulgo XML
> documents). Suppose I have a query on the tree structure. Suppose I
> want this query to be interpreted in a vague way.
>
> Any key words to search for in the literature?
>
> I know of similarity between trees, but that does not appear to apply
> here. First of all, the query is likely to be much smaller than the
> documents, and therefore the similarity is likely to be low.
> Secondly, the query may specify things which can't be expressed as
> trees. For instance, suppose people search for nodes labeled A which
> have either a child labeled B or a grandchild labeled C. This
> disjunction cannot be expressed as a tree.
>
> The second question is the relationship between the similarity and
> the relevance. How do we know that a similar tree is also more
> relevant to the user? It would be nice to have a theoretical
> foundation for this.
>
> kai
> --
> A large number of young women don't trust men with beards. (BFBS Radio)
>
Received on Fri Jul 12 2002 - 16:10:21 CEST

Original text of this message