Re: Newbie DBase architecture questions

From: James <jraustin1_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 31 May 2002 09:45:11 -0700
Message-ID: <a6e74506.0205310845.3e1ca78f_at_posting.google.com>

> Hierarchy wouldn't cut it.

Why wouldn't heirarchy cut it?
Complexity in implementing?
Performance considerations?
Or just not logical?

> General DAG and Materialized Transitive Closure solves the problem.

Could you give a simplified example of this methodology? Received on Fri May 31 2002 - 18:45:11 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Rick Morris: "Re: (OT)Dynamic inheritance (was: Object support in the relational model??)"
Previous message: James: "Re: Newbie DBase architecture questions"
Maybe in reply to: abaxaba: "Newbie DBase architecture questions"
In reply to Mikito Harakiri: "Re: Newbie DBase architecture questions"
Next in thread: Rick Morris: "Re: (OT)Dynamic inheritance (was: Object support in the relational model??)"
Reply: Mikito Harakiri: "Re: Newbie DBase architecture questions"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message