Re: Which normal form is this violating?
Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 16:47:05 +1000
Andrew Hamm wrote in message ...
>I think he probably meant "distinct" sets... Don't let the argument get
Even I can't express myself properly - sheesh.... Anyway, apply a bit of imagination. Received on Fri May 03 2002 - 08:47:05 CEST