Re: Artificial Primary keys

From: Michael Russell <mrussell_at_beeb.net>
Date: 24 Jan 2002 06:37:30 -0800
Message-ID: <c69419da.0201240637.58d58111@posting.google.com>

"Jan Emil Larsen" <jel_at_g-it.dk> wrote in message news:<3c4f3e5e$0$13976$edfadb0f_at_dspool01.news.tele.dk>...
> "--CELKO--" <71062.1056_at_compuserve.com> skrev i en meddelelse

> A key should be imutable, and should therefore be without information in it
> self.

Jan,

Does this mean you think that all keys should be "surrogates"? If it does, would you be willing to discuss how that's a good idea?

I'm not disagreeing, just interested.

Regards

Michael Received on Thu Jan 24 2002 - 08:37:30 CST