Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> relational databases vs. not-so relational databases

relational databases vs. not-so relational databases

From: Jeff Dugan <jdugan21_at_cogeco.ca>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 14:43:20 -0500
Message-ID: <3C49CC58.9A20CC0@cogeco.ca>


Hey everyone !

I've been struggling with my co-workers, big Lotus Notes enthusiasts, who believe that Notes is just as good if not better than any RDBMS (obviously IBM's sales/marketing people got to them first).

I have done some development with Notes and it is possible to develop a relational database (kind of) with Notes, however, it lacks sql. You can use LotusScript and/or Agents to handle database maintenance/functions, but it is very tedious.

Personally believe that a relational database (if designed/implemented correctly) are more powerful and manageable than any notes database ever could be. I also believe that while Notes is a RAD tool, development is fairly easy, yet frustrating to associate RDBMS theory to it.

Does anyone have any insight into matter?

Thanks

Received on Sat Jan 19 2002 - 13:43:20 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US