Re: Normalisation versus optimisation
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 16:21:03 +0100
"James" <jraustin1_at_hotmail.com> skrev i en meddelelse
> > > Because XDb is fast and flexible, denormalization is rarely necessary.
> > > Download your free copy from http://www.xdb1.com
> > This seems to me a bit off-topic. A question on
> > normalization/denormalization in relation to a RDBMS was raised
> A rdb is a subset of oodb.
No, or: irrelevant.
> > What do you btw mean by "(de)normalization " in an objeckt-oriented
> > (even if it "is rarely necessary")....
> I was suggesting that if one sees the solution in terms of objects, it
> is easier to determine a normalized design.
True!, but do you know why?
>As data complexity
> increases one will need to begin denormalizing earlier with a rdb than
> with an oodb typically due to performance degradation.
False, meaningless, <even more ugly words...>
What DO you mean by (de)normalization in an object-oriented database? What DO you mean by (de)normalization in any case?
I really don't see your point, apart from promoting some product of your own. Received on Thu Jan 03 2002 - 16:21:03 CET