| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: foreign vs primary key
Ewald Börger wrote:
> Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra wrote:
>
>>Ewald Börger wrote: >> >>>mikeg wrote: >>> >>>>identify the foreign key? How are they used? Aren't primary keys enough? >>>> >>>Normally: yes, up till yesterday I never bothered (mysql doesn't even[...]
>> Don't mess two issues. Your SQL Server database may be ill designed, but FKs [...]
> That actually *was* my point, meant to say it in a way like "if you
> never needed it, you wouldn't think it very important" :-)
Sorry for misunderstanding, the issue was that you actually said that primary keys were enough, and that's not true.
I see you may have tried to state the opposite to what you've ended up stating.
>> MySQL isn't a proper SQL -- not even a proper DBMS, much less RDBMS.
Even at these limited uses it will endanger your data and make you think erroneously, besides making you write unnecessary code; it's not good for anything that I know of.
Actually today PostgreSQL is usually faster than MySQL. It's hard to get performance when your design starts wrong.
> Maybe I didn't made my points to clear, English isn't my native language
> and I'm not at my best when it comes to database-related terms (I'm no
> database expert, just an end user :)
Then I suggest you read at least Date's An Introduction to Database
Systems before engaging in this newsgroup.
-- _ / \ Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra +55 (11) 246 96 07 \ / http://homepage.mac.com./leandrod/ BRASIL +55 (43) 322 89 71 X http://tutoriald.sourceforge.net./ mailto:lgcdutra@terra.com.br / \ Campanha fita ASCII, contra correio HTML mailto:leandrod_at_mac.comReceived on Thu Sep 20 2001 - 18:09:35 CDT
![]() |
![]() |